The Science

Medicine grounded in evidence, not hype.

A readable map of published GLP-1, peptide, NAD+ biology, metabolic and sexual-wellness research, with direct links to the studies our clinicians care about.

Evidence standard

We separate signal from certainty.

This page is built for physician review and verification: human trial evidence first, preclinical evidence clearly labeled. Every study card links out to the published record.

29

linked publications

6

therapy areas

2

evidence categories

Human trial evidence

Randomized trials and long-term outcome studies carry the most weight when a protocol has direct clinical data.

Preclinical evidence

Animal or in vitro findings are labeled as preclinical and are not presented as proven human benefits.

Biological rationale

How these therapies and cofactors act in the body.

Peptide signaling

Peptides are short chains of amino acids that relay precise instructions between cells and tissues, forming an essential part of how the body's physiology functions.

Compounded precision

Every dose is compounded in 503A and 503B licensed U.S. pharmacies, sterility-tested and calibrated to your individual labs and goals, not a one-size mass-market SKU.

Evidence-led

Protocols draw on peer-reviewed endocrinology, regenerative-medicine and longevity literature, then narrow decisions through physician review.

Published studies

The literature behind the protocols.

These are not marketing claims. They are starting points for physician review, therapeutic regimen selection and risk discussion. When human trials exist, they are listed before supporting review or preclinical literature.

Metabolic care

GLP-1, GIP and glucagon receptor evidence

Human randomized trials anchor the metabolic program. These studies cover weight, cardiometabolic endpoints and ASCVD-risk context, supporting why physician review, dose adjustment and monitoring matter.

Repair and recovery

Soft-tissue, wound and connective-tissue literature

This category is mostly preclinical. We surface that distinction clearly because animal and cell data are not the same as human outcome trials.

BPC-157Study 01

Gastric pentadecapeptide BPC 157 accelerates healing of transected rat Achilles tendon

Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 2003

Rat Achilles tendon model with biomechanical, functional and histologic endpoints.

BPC-157Study 02

Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 improves ligament healing in the rat

Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 2010

Rat medial collateral ligament healing study.

BPC-157Study 03

Stable Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 and Wound Healing

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2021

Review of wound-healing findings and proposed biological rationale.

BPC-157Study 04

BPC-157 as an Investigational Peptide Therapeutic

Pharmaceutics, 2026

Review of formulation challenges and translational development barriers.

BPC-157 / DogsStudy 05

Pharmacokinetics, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of body-protective compound 157 in rats and dogs

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2022

Preclinical ADME study that included beagle dogs; useful for veterinary research context, not evidence of approved pet treatment.

BPC-157 / Animal safetyStudy 06

Preclinical safety evaluation of body protective compound-157, a potential drug for treating various wounds

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2020

Toxicology program in mice, rats, rabbits and dogs; relevant to companion-animal research questions but still preclinical.

GHK-CuStudy 07

Regenerative and Protective Actions of the GHK-Cu Peptide

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2018

Review of gene-expression, tissue remodeling and protective biology.

GHK-CuStudy 08

In vivo stimulation of connective tissue accumulation by GHK-Cu in rat wounds

Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1993

Classic in vivo wound-chamber model.

Metabolic cofactor

NAD+ biology and human cofactor literature

NAD+ is a real physiological molecule and metabolic cofactor, not a peptide. The literature here separates human NAD+ precursor studies from preclinical and biology-focused work.

Endocrine body composition

Growth-hormone axis and body-composition evidence

Growth-hormone-axis protocols draw from specific endocrine trials and are narrowed through physician review of symptoms, risks, goals and monitoring needs.

Sexual wellness

Melanocortin and hormone-informed care

Sexual-wellness protocols require careful evaluation of regimen fit. The evidence here is strongest for bremelanotide in premenopausal women with acquired generalized HSDD.

Hormone care

Testosterone and menopausal hormone-therapy literature

Hormone protocols are evaluated around symptoms, labs, route, age, risk factors and follow-up. These papers highlight both potential benefit and the need for individualized prescribing.

Clinical translation

Evidence is the beginning of care, not the endpoint.

What the literature can do

It defines biological rationale, expected benefit, known adverse effects, contraindications and monitoring requirements.

What your clinician still decides

Whether a therapy fits your history, labs, medications, goals and state-specific prescribing requirements.

How dosing is approached

Physicians drive the protocol. When clinically appropriate, treatment may start at a minimum dose to assess tolerability before dose changes are considered.

What makes results interpretable

Expectations are benchmarked against a realistic timeline, and medications are paired with diet, exercise or tissue-specific rehabilitation where that is part of the therapeutic rationale.

A careful note

Published does not always mean proven for every patient.

Some therapies have large human trials; others have mainly biology-focused, preclinical or review literature. Pacific RX presents this page as education, not a guarantee of treatment, outcome or prescription.

Browse protocols

How to read the cards

  • Human randomized trials are strongest for patient-facing outcome claims.
  • Preclinical studies help explain biological plausibility, not guaranteed human results.
  • Review papers help clinicians see patterns, gaps and safety questions across the field.

See which protocol fits your biology.

Start with the protocol overview, then complete intake when you are ready for a clinician to review your history.

Browse protocols